Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2017 BMS CBCS Delhi University

Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2017 BMS CBCS Delhi University

In this post, I am going to present you the Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2017 BMS CBCS Delhi University for BMS Bachelor of Management Studies. Poisson Distribution, Rank Correlation Coefficient, Hypothesis, Measures of Central Tendency & Dispersion, Slicing are key requirements in this paper. Stay in touch for other study notes and solutions of the papers related to Statistics, Accounting, Finance, economics & other resource of Investment, Corporate finance and business.

bcfeducation.com

Table of Contents

Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2017 BMS CBCS Delhi University

Q.1: (a) Listed below is frequency distribution for returns in percentage terms for a sample of 100 equity mutual funds for the year 2016-17……….Compare the cut-off point returns for the top 25% and the bottom 25% of the distribution. What are the average returns?

Q.1: (a) Listed below is frequency distribution for returns in percentage terms for a sample of 100 equity mutual funds for the year 2016-17.

Returns%Number of Mutual Funds (f)
0—58
5—1026
10—1540
15—2016
20—2510

Compare the cut-off point returns for the top 25% and the bottom 25% of the distribution. What are the average returns? (6 Marks)

bcfeducation.com

Solution:

Returns%X (f)C.f
0—52.588
5—107.52634
10—1512.54074
15—2017.51690
20—2522.510100
  ∑f=n=100 

Bottom 25% cut-off point

25% of 100 = 25

25 ends before c.f 34 so cut-off point for bottom is 0—5

    \[ \(Average\ for\ bottom = \frac{\frac{2.5}{8}}{8} = 2.5\%\ \]

Top 25% cut-off point

75% of 100 = 75 75 falls in c.f 90 but greater than c.f 74 so cut-off point for top is 15—20

    \[ \(Average\ for\ Top = \frac{\frac{17.5}{8}}{8} = 17.5\%\ \]

(b) In a survey it was found that out of the total number of mobile phone owners, 35% are below the age group of 25 years and the remaining 65% above………Airtel connection. Given that a mobile phone owner is an Airtel subscriber. What is the likelihood that he/she is below 25 years of age?

(b) In a survey it was found that out of the total number of mobile phone owners, 35% are below the age group of 25 years and the remaining 65% above. Further, from another survey it was found that out of total number of mobile owners below 25 years of age, 40% are Airtel service subscribers. On the other hand 30% of above 25 years mobile owners have an Airtel connection. Given that a mobile phone owner is an Airtel subscriber. What is the likelihood that he/she is below 25 years of age? (5 Marks)

Solution:

Events:

Mobile phone owner is below 25 years of age = A

Mobile phone owner is an Airtel subscriber = B

Probability of mobile phone owner is below 25 years of age given that they are an Airtel subscriber = P(A|B)

Probability of a person is an Airtel subscriber below 25 years of age = P(B|A)

P(A) = 0.35

P(B) = (0.40)(0.35) + (0.30)(0.65) = 0.14 + 0.195 = 0.335

P(B|A) = 0.40

P(A|B) = ?

Apply Bayes Theorem

    \[ \(\mathbf{P(A|B)\ =}\frac{\mathbf{P(B|A) \times P(A)\ }}{\mathbf{P(B)}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P(A|B)\ =}\frac{\mathbf{0.40 \times 0.35\ }}{\mathbf{0.335}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{A} \middle| \mathbf{B} \right)\mathbf{= 0.4179}\  \]

So, the likelihood that a mobile phone owner, who is an Airtel subscriber, is below 25 years of age is approximately 0.4179 or 41.79%

(c) Calculate the Fisher’s Index for the Year 2016 using the following data (with 2015 as the Base Year):

(c) Calculate the Fisher’s Index for the Year 2016 using the following data (with 2015 as the Base Year):

Commodity2015201520162016
 PriceExpenditurePriceExpenditure
A8200651950
B201400301650
C58020900
D1036015300
E27216010600

(4 Marks)

Solution:

Commodity20152016poqop1q1p1qopoq1
Price poExpenditure q0Price p1Expenditure q1    
A8200/8=25651950/65=3020019501625240
B201400/20=70301650/30=551400165021001100
C580/5=1620900/20=4580900320225
D10360/10=3615300/15=20360300540200
E272160/27=8010600/10=6021606008001620
     4200540053853385
     ∑poqo=∑p1q1=∑p1qo=∑poq1=
bcfeducation.com

    \[ \(\mathbf{Fishe}\mathbf{r}^{\mathbf{'}}\mathbf{s\ Ideal\ Index\ 2016 =}\sqrt{\left( \frac{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{p}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{q}_{\mathbf{o}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{p}_{\mathbf{o}}\mathbf{q}_{\mathbf{o}}}\mathbf{\ \times \ }\frac{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{p}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{q}_{\mathbf{1}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{p}_{\mathbf{o}}\mathbf{q}_{\mathbf{1}}} \right)}\mathbf{\ \times \ 100}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Fishe}\mathbf{r}^{\mathbf{'}}\mathbf{s\ Ideal\ Index\ 2016 =}\sqrt{\left( \frac{\mathbf{5385}}{\mathbf{4200}}\mathbf{\ \times \ }\frac{\mathbf{5400}}{\mathbf{3385}} \right)}\mathbf{\ \times \ 100}\  \]

    \[  \(\mathbf{Fishe}\mathbf{r}^{\mathbf{'}}\mathbf{s\ Ideal\ Index\ 2016 =}\sqrt{\left( \mathbf{1.2821\ \times \ 1.5952} \right)}\mathbf{\ \times \ 100}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Fishe}\mathbf{r}^{\mathbf{'}}\mathbf{s\ Ideal\ Index\ 2016 = 143}\  \]

Q.2: (a) A survey was conducted among college students to enquire how much they spent on eating out in the last one month. The following data was obtained……..What is the average monthly expenditure? Find the Karl Pearson’s coefficient of skewness.

Q.2: (a) A survey was conducted among college students to enquire how much they spent on eating out in the last one month. The following data was obtained:

ExpendituresNumber of Students
0—5020
50—10010
100—15025
150—20020
200—25010
250—50015

What is the average monthly expenditure? Find the Karl Pearson’s coefficient of skewness. (6 Marks)

Solution:

ExpendituresfXfxfx²
0—50202550012500
50—100107575056250
100—150251253125390625
150—200201753500612500
200—250102252250506250
250—5001537556252109375
 100 157503687500
 ∑f= ∑fx=∑fx²=

    \[ \(\mathbf{Mean =}\frac{\mathbf{\sum fx}}{\mathbf{\sum f}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{15750}}{\mathbf{100}}\mathbf{= 157.50}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Mode = l +}\frac{\mathbf{fm - f}\mathbf{1}}{\left( \mathbf{fm - f}\mathbf{1} \right)\mathbf{+ (fm - f}\mathbf{2)}}\mathbf{\times h}\  \]

Maximum frequency is 25 so l=100, fm =25, f1 =10, f2 =20, h =50

    \[ \(\mathbf{Mode = 100 +}\frac{\mathbf{25 - 10}}{\left( \mathbf{25 - 10} \right)\mathbf{+ (25 - 20)}}\mathbf{\times 50}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Mode = 100 +}\frac{\mathbf{750}}{\mathbf{20}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Mode = 137.5}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{\sum fx²}}{\mathbf{\sum f}}\mathbf{-}\left( \frac{\mathbf{\sum fx}}{\mathbf{\sum f}} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{3687500}}{\mathbf{100}}\mathbf{-}\left( \mathbf{157.50} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D =}\sqrt{\mathbf{36875 - 24806.25}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D = 109.85}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Karl\ Pearson\ C.Skewness =}\frac{\mathbf{Mean - Mode}}{\mathbf{S.D}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Karl\ Pearson\ C.Skewness =}\frac{\mathbf{157.50 - 137.5}}{\mathbf{109.85}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Karl\ Pearson\ C.Skewness = 0.1820}\  \]

Positive Skewness longer tail to the right

(b) After an analysis of incoming faxes the manager of an accounting firm determined the probability distribution of the number of pages (X) per facsimile as follows………..Compute the mean and variance of the number of pages per fax. Further analysis by the manager revealed that the cost of processing each page of a fax is 0.25 Dollar. Determine the mean and variance of the cost per fax.

bcfeducation.com

(b) After an analysis of incoming faxes the manager of an accounting firm determined the probability distribution of the number of pages (X) per facsimile as follows:

X1234567
P(x)0.050.120.200.300.150.100.08

Compute the mean and variance of the number of pages per fax. Further analysis by the manager revealed that the cost of processing each page of a fax is 0.25 Dollar. Determine the mean and variance of the cost per fax. (5 Marks)

Solution:

xp(x)xp(x)x²p(x)
10.050.050.05
20.120.240.48
30.20.61.8
40.31.24.8
50.150.753.75
60.10.63.6
70.080.563.92
418.4
   xp(x)= x²p(x)=

Mean=E(X) = ∑ xp(x) = 4

Variance (X) = E(X²) – E(X)²

Variance (X) = ∑ x²p(x) – [∑ xp(x)]²

Variance (X) = 18.4 – (4)²

Variance (X) = 2.4

Mean and variance of the cost per fax if processing cost is 0.25 Dollar:

Y = 0.25X

E(Y) = E(0.25X)

E(Y) = 0.25E(X)

E(Y) = 0.25(4)

Mean E(Y) = 1

V(Y) = V(0.25X)

V(Y) = (0.25)²Var(X)

V(Y) = (0.0625)(2.4)

V(Y) = 0.15

(c) Distinguish between Correlation and Regression analysis. (4 Marks)

Answer: While both regression and correlation analysis are statistical methods for examining quantifiable relationship between variables, they have distinct uses and provide various kinds of data:

Correlation Analysis:

Definition:

Correlation analysis is a statistical technique used to determine the direction and degree of a link between two quantitative variables.


Goal: Without suggesting causality, it aids in understanding how changes in one variable are related to changes in another.


Quantify: The coefficient of correlation, commonly represented as (r).

Measure: The degree of a linear relationship between two variables may be measured using correlation. It has a range of -1 to 1, with 0 denoting no linear correlation, -1 denoting perfect negative correlation, and 1 denoting perfect positive correlation.


Interpretation: A strong linear relationship is indicated by a correlation around -1 or 1, whereas a weak or nonexistent linear link is indicated by a correlation near 0.
For instance, correlation analysis may be used to look at the link between study time and test results or rainfall and agricultural productivity.

Regression Analysis:

Definition:

A statistical technique called regression analysis is used to describe the connection between one or more independent variables (predictors) and a dependent variable (response).


Goal: It is useful to comprehend the nature of the relationship between the independent and dependent variables and to forecast the value of the dependent variable based on the values of the independent variables.


Models: Depending on the characteristics of the variables and the relationship’s underlying assumptions, there are several kinds of regression models, including logistic regression, multiple regression, and linear regression.

Measure: The coefficients in the regression equation show the strength and direction of each independent variable’s influence on the dependent variable. The regression equation depicts the mathematical link between the variables.

bcfeducation.com


Interpretation: Regression analysis enables prediction and hypothesis testing while offering insights into how changes in one or more independent variables impact the dependent variable.
For instance, regression analysis may be used to estimate the link between temperature and ice cream sales or to anticipate property values based on variables like size, location, and number of bedrooms.

In conclusion, regression analysis models the link between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables, enabling prediction and hypothesis testing, whereas correlation analysis measures the strength and direction of the association between two variables. While they accomplish distinct goals in terms of comprehending the connections between variables, both approaches are useful tools for data analysis and interpretation.

Q.3: (a) The table given below provides a summary of total; expenditure by the Government of India for Health and Sanitation from 2010-11 to 2016-17……..Fit an exponential trend (Y = a+bx) to the given data and estimate the expenditure for the year 2017-18.

Q.3: (a) The table given below provides a summary of total; expenditure by the Government of India for Health and Sanitation from 2010-11 to 2016-17:

Year2010-112011-122012-132013-142014-152015-162016-17
Expenditure (in Rs. Crore)177.2185.0224.9254.0304.9359.9438.8

Fit an exponential trend (Y = a+bx) to the given data and estimate the expenditure for the year 2017-18. (6 Marks)

Solution:

YearExpenditures (in Rs. Crore) Steel (m.t) (y)x = t – 2012  xy
2010-11177.2-39-531.6
2011-12185-24-370
2012-13224.9-11-224.9
2013-14254000
2014-15304.911304.9
2015-16359.924719.8
2016-17438.8391316.4
n=7∑y =1944.7∑x = 0∑x² = 28∑xy =1214.6

Fitting straight Line

Let the straight line:

y = a + bx where 

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\frac{\mathbf{\sum y}}{\mathbf{n}}\mathbf{,\ b =}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\frac{\mathbf{\sum y}}{\mathbf{n}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1944.7}}{\mathbf{7}}\mathbf{= 277.81}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b =}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1214.6}}{\mathbf{28}}\mathbf{= 43.3785}\ \]

y = a + bx

y = 277.81 + 43.3785x

Estimate the expenditure for the year 20l7-18

First x = t – 2017-18 = 4

Now putting x = 4 into straight line equation:

y = 277.81 + 43.3785x

y = 277.81 + 43.3785(4)

y = 451.324 so the expenditure for the year 2017-18 will be 451.324.

(b) Given below are the approximate average returns obtained from Gold and real estate over the last 5 years………………..Which of the two offers the more consistent returns?

(b) Given below are the approximate average returns obtained from Gold and real estate over the last 5 years:

YearGold %Real Estate %
2012-13108
2013-14107
2014-1565
2015-1645
2016-1793

Which of the two offers the more consistent returns? (5 Marks)

Solution:

YearGold % (X1)X1²Real Estate %(X2)X2²
2012-1310100864
2013-1410100749
2014-15636525
2015-16416525
2016-1798139
     
  X1 =39 X1²=333 X2 =28 X2²=172

Mean & C.V of Gold:

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{Gold}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{1}}\ \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{Gold}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{39}}{\mathbf{5}}\mathbf{= 7.8}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Gold =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{1}^{\mathbf{2}}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{-}\left( \frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{1}} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Gold =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{333}}{\mathbf{5}}\mathbf{-}\left( \mathbf{7.8} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Gold =}\sqrt{\mathbf{5.76}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Gold = 2.4}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Gold =}\frac{\mathbf{\ S.D}}{\mathbf{Mean}}\mathbf{\times 100}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Gold =}\frac{\mathbf{\ 2.4}}{\mathbf{7.8}}\mathbf{\times 100}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Gold = 30.76}\ \]

Mean & C.V of Real Estate:

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{Real\ Estate}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{2}}\ \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{Real\ Estate}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{28}}{\mathbf{5}}\mathbf{= 5.6}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Real\ Estate =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{2}^{\mathbf{2}}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{-}\left( \frac{\mathbf{\sum x}\mathbf{2}}{\mathbf{n}\mathbf{2}} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Real\ Estate =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{172}}{\mathbf{5}}\mathbf{-}\left( \mathbf{5.6} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Real\ Estate =}\sqrt{\mathbf{3.04}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S.D\ Real\ Estate = 1.7435}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Real\ Estate =}\frac{\mathbf{\ S.D}}{\mathbf{Mean}}\mathbf{\times 100}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Real\ Estate =}\frac{\mathbf{\ 1.7435}}{\mathbf{5.6}}\mathbf{\times 100}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{C.V\ Real\ Estate = 31.13}\ \]

bcfeducation.com

Results:

Gold Mean = 7.8

Gold C.V = 30.76%

Real Estate Mean = 5.6

Real Estate C.V = 31.13%

Conclusion:

Average return of Gold 7.8% is greater than the average return of Real Estate 5.6% so Gold has higher return than real estate.

C.V of Gold 30.76% is less than the C.V of Real Estate 31.13% so Gold stock is more consistent than Real Estate.

(c) A manufacturing company regularly conducts quality control checks at specified periods on the products it manufactures. Historically, the failure rate for LED light bulbs that the company manufactures is 5%. Suppose a random sample of 10 LED bulbs is selected. Let X represents number of defective LED light bulbs.

(i) What is the probability that two or fewer of the LED light bulbs are defective?

(ii) What is the mean and variance of X?      (4 Marks) 

Solution:

(i) What is the probability that two or fewer of the LED light bulbs are defective?

Here our concern is to check the probability of defective bulbs so we select p = 0.05 and q = 0.95

    \[ \(\mathbf{p = 0.05,\ q = 0.95}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{n = 10,\ x = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}\ \]

Formula

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = x} \right)\mathbf{=}\begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{n} \\ \mathbf{x} \\ \end{pmatrix}\mathbf{\ }\mathbf{p}^{\mathbf{x}}\mathbf{\ }\mathbf{q}^{\mathbf{n - x}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 2} \right)\mathbf{=}\begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{10} \\ \mathbf{2} \\ \end{pmatrix}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.05} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.95} \right)^{\mathbf{10 - 2}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 2} \right)\mathbf{= 45 \times 0.0025 \times 0.6634 = 0.0746}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 1} \right)\mathbf{=}\begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{10} \\ \mathbf{1} \\ \end{pmatrix}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.05} \right)^{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.95} \right)^{\mathbf{10 - 1}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 1} \right)\mathbf{= 10 \times 0.05 \times 0.6302 = 0.3151}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 0} \right)\mathbf{=}\begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{10} \\ \mathbf{0} \\ \end{pmatrix}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.05} \right)^{\mathbf{0}}\mathbf{\ }\left( \mathbf{0.95} \right)^{\mathbf{10 - 0}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X = 0} \right)\mathbf{= 1 \times 1 \times 0.5987 = 0.5987}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{X \leq 2} \right)\mathbf{= 0.5987}\mathbf{+}\mathbf{0.3151 + 0.0746 = 0.9884}\ \]

(ii) What is the mean and variance of X?       

Mean = np

Mean = (10)(0.05)=0.5

Variance = npq

Variance = (10)(0.05)(0.95)Variance =0.475

Q.4: (a) The following data relates to scores obtained by nine Salesmen of a company in an Intelligence test and their Weekly Sales (in ‘000)………..Obtain the two regression equations; Weekly Sales on Intelligence test score of the Salesman and Intelligence test score of the Sales man on Weekly Sales . If the Intelligence test score of a Sales man is 65, what would be his expected Weekly Sales?

Q.4: (a) The following data relates to scores obtained by nine Salesmen of a company in an Intelligence test and their Weekly Sales (in ‘000):

SalesmanTest ScoreWeekly Sales (in “1000”)
15030
26060
35040
46050
58060
65030
78070
84050
97060

Obtain the two regression equations; Weekly Sales on Intelligence test score of the Salesman and Intelligence test score of the Sales man on Weekly Sales . If the Intelligence test score of a Sales man is 65, what would be his expected Weekly Sales?                                              (6 Marks)

Solution:

Test Score (X)Weekly Sales (in “1000”) (Y)XY
503015002500900
6060360036003600
5040200025001600
6050300036002500
8060480064003600
503015002500900
8070560064004900
4050200016002500
7060420049003600
540450282003400024100
∑x =∑y =∑xy =∑x² =∑y² =

Line of Regression Y on X Weekly Sales on Intelligence test score of the Salesman

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= a + bx}\ \]

Where:

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{- b}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{\ \ \&\ }\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{yx}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy - n}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{- n}{\mathbf{(}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}}}\mathbf{\ \ \ }\ \]

    \[ \(\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum x}}{\mathbf{n}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{540}}{\mathbf{9}}\mathbf{= 60}\ \]

    \[ \(\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum y}}{\mathbf{n}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{450}}{\mathbf{9}}\mathbf{= 50}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{yx}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy - n}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{x}^{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{- n}{\mathbf{(}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}}}\mathbf{\ \ \ }\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{yx}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{28200 - 9(60)(50)}}{\mathbf{34000}\mathbf{- 9}\mathbf{(60)}^{\mathbf{2}}}\mathbf{\ \ \ }\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{yx}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1200}}{\mathbf{1600}}\mathbf{= 0.75\ \ }\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{- b}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a = 50 - (0.75)(60)}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a = 5}\ \]

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= a + bx}\ \]

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= 5 + 0.75}\mathbf{x}\ \]

Line of Regression X on Y Intelligence test score of the Sales man on Weekly Sales

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{= a + by}\ \]

Where:

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{- b}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{\ \ \&\ }\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{xy}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy - n}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{y}^{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{- n}{\mathbf{(}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{xy}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum xy - n}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}}{\mathbf{\sum}\mathbf{y}^{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{- n}{\mathbf{(}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{xy}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{28200 - 9(60)(50)}}{\mathbf{24100 - 9}\mathbf{(50)}^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{b}_{\mathbf{xy}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{1200}}{\mathbf{1600}}\mathbf{= 0.75}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a =}\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{- b}\overline{\mathbf{Y}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{a = 60 - 0.75(50)}\ \]

    \[  \(\mathbf{a = 22.5}\ \]

    \[  \(\widehat{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{= a + by}\ \]

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{= 22.5 + 0.75}\mathbf{y}\  \]

If the Intelligence test score of a Sales man is 65, what would be his expected Weekly Sales?

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= 5 + 0.75}\mathbf{x}\  \]

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= 5 + 0.75(65)}\  \]

    \[ \(\widehat{\mathbf{Y}}\mathbf{= 53.75}\  \]

bcfeducation.com

(b) ABC Trucking Company determined that the distance travelled per truck per year is normally distributed, with a mean of 50 thousand miles and a standard deviation of 12 thousand miles.

(i) What proportion of trucks can be expected to travel between 34 and 50 thousand miles in a year?

(ii) How many miles will be travelled by at least 80% of the trucks? (5 Marks)

Solution: (i)

    \[  \(\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{X - Mu}}{\mathbf{\sigma}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{34000 - 50000}}{\mathbf{12000}}\mathbf{= - 1.33}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{X - Mu}}{\mathbf{\sigma}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{50000 - 50000}}{\mathbf{12000}}\mathbf{= 0}\  \]

    \[  \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{34000 < X < 50000} \right)\mathbf{= P( - 1.33 < X < 0)}\ \]

Go to Z distribution table & find following probabilities:

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{- 1.33} \right)\mathbf{= 0.0918}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{0} \right)\mathbf{= 0.5000}\  \]

Subtract above probabilities

0.5000 – 0.0918 = 0.4082

So 40.82% trucks can be expected to travel between 38 and 50 thousand miles in a year.

(ii) First we go to the Z Normal Probability Table and locate 1 – 0.80 =0.20 that will be found in -0.8 row and 4th column.

So:

    \[ \(Z_{0.80} = - 0.84,\ Mu = 50,000,\ \sigma = 12,000,\ X = ?\  \]

Formula Applied

    \[ \(\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{0.80}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{X - Mu}}{\mathbf{\sigma}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{- 0.84 =}\frac{\mathbf{X - 50000}}{\mathbf{12000}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{- 0.84 \times 12000 = X - 50000}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{X = - 10080 + 50000}\  \]

    \[  \(\mathbf{X = 39920}\ \]

(c) Distinguish between Type I and Type II errors. (4 Marks)

Answer:

Type I Error:

Definition: False positives, or type I errors, happen when the null hypothesis (H0) is mistakenly rejected when it is true.
Probability: The likelihood of committing a Type I mistake, represented by 𝛼, indicates the test’s significance level.
Consequence: Making the wrong judgments by concluding that there is a major influence or difference when there isn’t.
Example: Dismissing the null hypothesis that a novel medication has no adverse effects when, in reality, none exist.

Type II Error:

Definition: False negatives, or type II errors, happen when the null hypothesis (H0) is mistakenly accepted when it is not, as is the case with this instance.
Probability: The likelihood of committing a Type II mistake is represented by 𝛽.
Consequence: Missing chances or drawing the wrong conclusions as a result of failing to identify a substantial influence or difference when there is one.
Example: Failing to reject the null hypothesis that a new medication has no adverse effects, when, in reality, it does.

Q.5: (a) In 1993, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) was considering a proposal to .require companies to report the potential effect of employee’s stock options on earnings per share (EPS). A random sample of 41 high-technology firms revealed that the new proposal would reduce EPS by an average of 13.8 percent, with a standard deviation of 18.9 percent. A random sample of 35 producers of consumer goods showed that the proposal would reduce EPS by 9.1 percent on average, with a standard deviation of 8.7 percent. On the basis of these samples, is it reasonable to conclude at 5% level of significance that the FASB proposal will cause a greater reduction in EPS for high technology firms than for producers of consumer goods? (6 Marks)

Solution:

Data

X̅1 = 13.8, n1 = 41, S1 =18.9, S1² =357.21

X̅2 = 9.1, n2 = 35, S2 =8.7, S2² = 75.69

Step 1: Stating Null and Alternative Hypothesis

Ho: Null Hypotheses = µ1= µ2

H1: Alternative Hypotheses = µ1< µ2

Step 2: Level of significance

Alpha α = 0.05

Step 3: Test Statistics

    \[  \(\mathbf{Z =}\frac{\mathbf{(x\overline{}}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{-}{\overline{\mathbf{x}}}_{\mathbf{2)}}\mathbf{-}\mathbf{(\mu}_{\mathbf{1}}\mathbf{-}\mathbf{\mu}_{\mathbf{2}}\mathbf{)}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{\mathbf{S}\mathbf{1}^{\mathbf{2}}}{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{1}}}\mathbf{+}\frac{\mathbf{S}\mathbf{2}^{\mathbf{2}}}{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{2}}} \right)}}\ \]

Step 4: Critical Region

1-0.05 = 0.95 go to Z Cumulative Standardized Normal Distribution Table & locate 0.95 Z > 1.645

    \[ \(\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{\alpha}}\mathbf{=}\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{0.05}}\mathbf{= \pm 1.645)}\  \]

Step 5: Calculation

    \[ \(\mathbf{Z =}\frac{\mathbf{13.8 - 9.1 - (0)}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{\mathbf{357.21}}{\mathbf{41}}\mathbf{+}\frac{\mathbf{75.69}}{\mathbf{35}} \right)}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Z =}\frac{\mathbf{4.7}}{\mathbf{3.297}}\mathbf{= 1.425}\  \]

Step 6: Conclusion

Since calculated value of z statistic 1.425 is less than the tabulated value 1.645 or it falls in acceptance region so we accept null hypothesis and reject alternative hypothesis and we can conclude that at 5% level of significance FASB proposal will cause no reduction in EPS for high technology firms than for producers of consumer goods.

bcfeducation.com

(b) An economist wanted to find out whether there is any relationship between the unemployment rate in country and its inflation rate. Data from 7 countries for the year 2016 is given below……………………Use Spearman’s Rank Correlation to find the strength of association between unemployment rate in a country and its inflation rate.

(b) An economist wanted to find out whether there is any relationship between the unemployment rate in country and its inflation rate. Data from 7 countries for the year 2016 is given below:

CountryABCDEFG
Unemployment rate (per cent)1191371388
Inflation rate (per cent)4578635

Use Spearman’s Rank Correlation to find the strength of association between unemployment rate in a country and its inflation rate. (5 Marks)

Solution:

CountryUnemployment rate (per cent)Inflation rate (per cent)Rank Unemployment Rate (x)Rank Inflation Rate (y)d=x-y
A1145239
B9543.50.50.25
C1376.560.50.25
D7817-636
E1366.551.52.25
F832.511.52.25
G852.53.5-11
n=7∑d=0∑d²=51

Hence, we see that in the X-series the items 8 and 13 are repeated, each occurring twice and in the

Y-series the item 5 is repeated. Thus in each of the three cases m = 2. We have to apply correction factor:

    \[ \(Correction\ Factor = \ \frac{m(m^{2} - 1)}{12}\  \]

    \[ \(Correction\ Factor = \ \frac{2(2^{2} - 1)}{12} + \frac{2(2^{2} - 1)}{12} + \frac{2(2^{2} - 1)}{12} = 1.5\  \]

    \[ \(\rho_{xy} = 1 - \frac{6\sum d^{2}}{n(n^{2} - 1)}\  \]

But we have correction factor here so we are going to change the formula:

    \[  \(\rho_{xy} = 1 - \frac{6\sum d^{2} + C.F}{n(n^{2} - 1)}\ \]

    \[ \(\rho_{xy} = 1 - \frac{6(51) + 1.5}{7(7^{2} - 1)}\  \]

    \[ \(\rho_{xy} = 1 - \frac{307.5}{336}\  \]

    \[ \(\rho_{xy} = 0.0848\  \]

Indicating strong association

Poisson Probability Distribution

(c) A.B. Power and Associates calculates and publishes various statistics concerning car quality. The initial quality score measures the number of problems per new car sold. For 2017 model cars, an automobile company KPS had 1.02 problems per car. Let the random variable X be equal to the number of problems with a newly purchased 2017 KPS car.

(i) What assumptions must be made in order for X to be distributed as a Poisson random variable? Are these assumptions reasonable?

(ii) Making the assumptions as in (i), if you purchased a 2017 KPS car, what is the probability that the new car will have two or fewer problems? (4 Marks)

Solution:

(i) For the random variable X to be distributed as a Poisson random variable, several assumptions must be met:

The number of events (problems in this case) must be countable.

The events must occur independently of each other.

The probability of more than one event occurring in an infinitesimally small time interval is negligible.

The probability of an event occurring is constant over time and across all intervals.

In this case, assuming that each car’s problems are independent events and occur randomly with a constant average rate, the Poisson distribution could be a reasonable approximation.

(ii) Given that the average rate is 1.02 problems per car, we can use the Poisson distribution formula to find the probability of having two or fewer problems:

    \[ \(\mathbf{Poisson\ Distribution = P}\left( \mathbf{X} \right)\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{e}^{\mathbf{- \lambda}}\mathbf{\lambda}^{\mathbf{x}}}{\mathbf{x!}}\ \]

Where:

P(X) = the probability of X events in an area of opportunity

λ= expected number of events = 1.02

e = mathematical constant approximated by 2.71828

X = number of events=0, 1, 2

P(X=≤2)=P(x=1)+P(x=2)+P(x=3)

    \[  \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{x = 0} \right)\mathbf{=}\frac{\left( \mathbf{2.71828} \right)^{\mathbf{- 1.02}}\mathbf{(1.02)}^{\mathbf{0}}}{\mathbf{0!}}\mathbf{= 0.36060}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{x = 1} \right)\mathbf{=}\frac{\left( \mathbf{2.71828} \right)^{\mathbf{- 1.02}}\mathbf{(1.02)}^{\mathbf{1}}}{\mathbf{1!}}\mathbf{= 0.36781}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{P}\left( \mathbf{x = 2} \right)\mathbf{=}\frac{\left( \mathbf{2.71828} \right)^{\mathbf{- 1.02}}\mathbf{(1.02)}^{\mathbf{2}}}{\mathbf{2!}}\mathbf{= 0.18758}\  \]

P(X=≤2)= 0.36060+0.36781+0.18758 =0.91599

Q.6: (a) Prices of shares (in rupees) of a company on the different days in a month were found to be: 66, 65, 69, 70, 69, 71, 70, 63, 64 and 68. Assuming the prices of shares follow normal distribution and its standard distribution is unknown, test at 5 percent level of significance that the sample average price of the shares in that month is same as 65. Does the above data indicate that there is a factual basis for the grumblings? State and test appropriate hypothesis at alpha = 0.05?                    (6 Marks)

Solution:

Prices of Shares X(X – X̅)(X – X̅)²
66-1.52.25
65-2.56.25
691.52.25
702.56.25
691.52.25
713.512.25
702.56.25
63-4.520.25
64-3.512.25
680.50.25
∑X=675 ∑(X – X̅)²=70.5

    \[ \(\overline{\mathbf{X}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{\sum X}}{\mathbf{n}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{675}}{\mathbf{10}}\mathbf{= 67.5}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{n - 1}}\mathbf{\sum}\left( \mathbf{X -}\overline{\mathbf{X}} \right)^{\mathbf{2}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{1}}{\mathbf{10 - 1}}\mathbf{(70.5)}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S = 2.798}\ \]

Step 1: Stating Null and Alternative Hypothesis

Ho: Null Hypotheses = µ=65

H1: Alternative Hypotheses = µ ≠ 65

Step 2: Level of significance

Alpha α = 0.05, n = 10

Step 3: Test Statistics

    \[ \(\mathbf{t =}\frac{\overline{\mathbf{x}}\mathbf{-}\mathbf{\mu}_{\mathbf{0}}}{\frac{\mathbf{s}}{\sqrt{\mathbf{n}}}}\ \]

Step 4: Critical Region

    \[ \(\mathbf{t}_{\mathbf{0.05(10 - 1)}}\mathbf{= \pm 2.262}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{t\ > \ 2.262\ (t < 2.262\ and\ t > 2.262)}\ \]

Step 5: Calculation

    \[ \(\mathbf{t =}\frac{\overline{\mathbf{x}}\mathbf{-}\mathbf{\mu}_{\mathbf{0}}}{\frac{\mathbf{s}}{\sqrt{\mathbf{n}}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{t =}\frac{\mathbf{67.5 - 65}}{\frac{\mathbf{2.798}}{\sqrt{\mathbf{10}}}}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{t =}\frac{\mathbf{2.5}}{\mathbf{0.8848}}\mathbf{= 2.8254}\ \]

Step 6: Conclusion

Since calculated value of t statistic 2.8254 exceeds than the tabulated value 2.262 or it falls in critical region so we reject null hypothesis and accept alternative hypothesis and we can say that the average price of the shares in that month is not same as 65.

Does the above data indicate that there is a factual basis for the grumblings?

Rejecting the null hypothesis indicates that there is enough data to draw the conclusion that the sample average share price differs considerably from 65 rupees. This does not, however, directly suggest whether or not the complaints have a solid basis in reality.

The null hypothesis is rejected, implying that the sample data indicates a different mean share price than 65 rupees. Depending on the situation and the specifics of the complaints, this may or may not validate the complaints.

If the complaints are about the share price being too high or too low in relation to an expected value (such as 65 rupees), then the null hypothesis’ rejection may validate such complaints. However, this statistical test by itself might not be sufficient to support or refute complaints regarding other factors unrelated to the mean share price.

In conclusion, even though the null hypothesis was rejected, there is still a difference in the sample mean share price. However, more research and context-specific considerations are required to ascertain whether the complaints have a solid foundation.

bcfeducation.com

(b) Given that the mean sale of 30 FMCG companies in the year 2016-17 was 300 crore and the mean sales of 70 IT companies was 2000 crore. The standard deviation for FMCG companies was, 50 crores and for IT companies 1000 crores. Find the combined mean and standard deviation for the two groups taken together. (5 Marks)

Solution:

Data Company A:

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{= 300,\ }{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{IT}}\mathbf{= 2000}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{(FMCG)}}\mathbf{= 50,\ }\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{(IT)}}\mathbf{= 1000}\ \]

    \[ \({\mathbf{S}^{\mathbf{2}}}_{\mathbf{(FMCG)}}\mathbf{= 2500,\ }{\mathbf{S}^{\mathbf{2}}}_{\mathbf{(IT)}}\mathbf{= 1000,000}\ \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{= 30,\ }\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{IT}}\mathbf{= 70}\ \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{+}\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{IT}}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{IT}}}{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{+}\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{IT}}}\  \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{(30 \times 300) + (70 \times 2000)}}{\mathbf{30 + 70}}\  \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{=}\frac{\mathbf{9000 + 140000}}{\mathbf{100}}\  \]

    \[ \({\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{= 1490}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Combined\ S.D =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\left\lbrack {\mathbf{S}^{\mathbf{2}}}_{\mathbf{(FMCG)}}\mathbf{+}{\mathbf{(}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{-}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}} \right\rbrack\mathbf{+}\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{IT}}\left\lbrack {\mathbf{S}^{\mathbf{2}}}_{\mathbf{(IT)}}\mathbf{+}{\mathbf{(}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{IT}}\mathbf{-}{\overline{\mathbf{X}}}_{\mathbf{c}}\mathbf{)}}^{\mathbf{2}} \right\rbrack\mathbf{\ }}{\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{FMCG}}\mathbf{+}\mathbf{n}_{\mathbf{IT}}}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Combined\ S.D =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{30}\left\lbrack \mathbf{2500 +}\mathbf{(300 - 1490)}^{\mathbf{2}} \right\rbrack\mathbf{+ 70}\left\lbrack \mathbf{1000000 +}\mathbf{(2000 - 1490)}^{\mathbf{2}} \right\rbrack\mathbf{\ }}{\mathbf{30 + 70}}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Combined\ S.D =}\sqrt{\frac{\mathbf{42558000 + 88207000\ }}{\mathbf{100}}}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Combined\ S.D = 1143.52}\  \]

    \[ \(\mathbf{Combined\ C.V =}\frac{\mathbf{Combined\ S.D}}{\mathbf{Combined\ Mean}}\mathbf{\times 100}\  \]

    \[  \(\mathbf{Combined\ C.V =}\frac{\mathbf{1143.52}}{\mathbf{1490}}\mathbf{\times 100 = 76.74}\ \]

(c) Given below are two series of Price index of Steel. Splice them with the base 2014 =100……………….What is the percentage change in the price of Steel between 2010 and 2015?

(c) Given below are two series of Price index of Steel. Splice them with the base 2014 =100

YearSeries A Base 2005 = 100Series B Base 2014 = 100
2010141.5 
2011163.7 
2012158.2 
2013156.8 
2014157.1100
2015 102.3

What is the percentage change in the price of Steel between 2010 and 2015? (4 Marks)

Solution:

YearSeries A Base 2005 = 100New Price Index (Base 2014=100)
2010141.5(100/157.1)141.5=90.07
2011163.7(100/157.1)163.7=104.20
2012158.2(100/157.1)158.2=100.70
2013156.8(100/157.1)156.8=99.81
2014157.1100
2015 102.3
bcfeducation.com

Percentage increase in the price of steel between 2010 and 2015 is:

    \[ \(\mathbf{Percentage\ Increase =}\frac{\mathbf{102.3 - 90.07}}{\mathbf{90.07}}\mathbf{\times 100 = 13.57\%}\  \]

Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2016 BMS CBCS Delhi University

Business Statistics & Mathematics PU Notes and Papers

Financial Accounting I PU

Advanced Financial Accounting II PU

Cost & Management Accounting PU

1 thought on “Solved Paper Statistics for Business Decisions 2017 BMS CBCS Delhi University”

  1. I was suggested this web site by my cousin Im not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my trouble You are incredible Thanks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *