The Ultimate Guide to Appraisal process, Appraisal Methods, Factors that can distort appraisal: Understanding the employee appraisal process is crucial for both business students and HR professionals. This blog post explores the key steps in the appraisal process, different performance appraisal methods (such as 360-degree feedback, graphic rating scales, and MBO), and common biases and distortions that can affect fair evaluations. Whether you’re a student of business and finance or a working professional, this guide will help you grasp best practices for effective performance appraisals while avoiding common pitfalls. This topic is equally important for the students of the subject Human Resource Management across all the major Universities such as MU, DU, PU & others & across all business & finance disciplines.
Read now to enhance your HRM knowledge!
Table of Contents
10.1:The Ultimate Guide to Appraisal process, Appraisal Methods, Factors that can distort appraisal
The Appraisal Process
Establish Performance Standards
The first step in evaluating employee performance is to set clear performance standards that align with the company’s goals. These standards should come from a proper job analysis and job description. It’s important that these standards are clear and measurable. Vague phrases like “do a good job” or “work a full day” don’t tell employees what’s really expected. A manager must clearly understand and communicate what successful performance looks like, so employees know what they’re being measured against.
Communicate Expectations
Once standards are set, managers need to communicate them to employees. Employees shouldn’t be left guessing what’s expected of them. Unfortunately, many jobs have unclear standards, especially when employees aren’t involved in setting them. Real communication should go both ways. Simply giving information isn’t enough—employees need a chance to ask questions and share input too.
Measure Actual Performance
Now that expectations are clear, it’s time to track how employees are actually doing. This can be done in several ways, like observing them directly, reviewing reports, or having regular check-ins. Using multiple sources gives a fuller picture and makes it more likely the information is reliable. It’s not just about how we measure, though—it’s also about what we choose to measure. If we focus on the wrong things, it can lead to bad outcomes. What we measure should reflect the original performance goals, so employees know what to focus on.
Compare Actual Performance with Standards
After collecting data, managers compare what the employee actually did to the performance standards that were set earlier. The evaluation form should explain both the standards and what different levels of performance look like—what’s acceptable, good, or needs improvement. This comparison helps provide clear feedback and leads into the next step—discussing the results with the employee.
Discuss the Appraisal with the Employee
Talking to an employee about how they’re doing can be one of the toughest parts of a manager’s job. It can affect how an employee feels about their abilities and influence how they perform in the future. It’s easier to deliver good news, but harder to give negative feedback. How the conversation is handled can either motivate or discourage the employee, so it’s important to approach this with care and respect.
Initiate Corrective Action if Necessary
If there are performance issues, action might be needed. There are two kinds of corrective actions:
Immediate action, which fixes the problem quickly (like retraining or correcting a mistake), and
Basic action, which looks deeper to find out what caused the issue in the first place.
Some managers just deal with problems as they pop up (“putting out fires”), but it’s better to take time to fix the root cause. Doing that now can prevent bigger problems down the road.
Appraisal Methods
Now let’s look at how we can actually evaluate performance. There are three main ways to do this:
- Comparing employees to absolute standards,
- Comparing employees to each other, or
- Judging based on results or outcomes.
Each method has its pros and cons, and the best choice depends on the situation.
Evaluating Absolute Standards
This method compares each employee to a fixed standard, not to each other. It looks at how well someone does their job based on certain behaviors or traits. There are a few ways to do this:
Critical Incident Appraisal
This method focuses on key moments when an employee either did something really well or really poorly. The manager writes down specific examples of these incidents. For example, a police officer calming down a dangerous situation might be recorded as a positive incident.
This method is helpful because it shows exactly what behavior was good or bad, rather than just saying someone is “smart” or “lazy.” It gives clear examples of what needs to improve.
But it has some downsides too:
- Managers need to write these incidents regularly, which takes time and effort.
- It’s hard to turn these stories into numbers or scores for comparison.
Checklist Appraisal
In this method, the evaluator is given a list of employee behaviors and simply checks off the ones that match what the employee has done. They don’t actually judge the employee’s performance—they just record what they observe. After that, someone from the HR department scores the checklist, giving more weight to items that are more important for the job. The final score may then be discussed with the employee by either the original evaluator or an HR person.
This system helps reduce bias because the person scoring the checklist is different from the person filling it out. However, the evaluator might still guess which behaviors are seen as good or bad, which can lead to bias. Also, creating detailed checklists for different jobs takes a lot of time and effort, making this approach a bit costly and slow.
Graphic Rating Scale Appraisal
This is one of the oldest and most common ways to evaluate employees. It uses a scale to rate things like how much work an employee gets done, how well they know their job, how dependable they are, and more. While it works well for clear, job-related qualities, it’s less accurate for vague traits like “loyalty” or “integrity” unless those are clearly defined in terms of behavior.
Forced-Choice Appraisal
This method is like those personality quizzes where you pick the option that sounds most like you. Evaluators choose between a few statements that describe an employee, even if all options seem good or bad. The evaluator doesn’t know which choice is the “right” one because someone in HR scores the answers based on what fits the job best.
The good thing is that this helps prevent bias, since evaluators can’t play favorites. But many people don’t like this system because it’s frustrating to choose between very similar statements and not know what makes a good or bad choice. They may even try to guess the scoring system to match their personal opinion.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
This method combines parts of both checklist and rating scale methods. Employees are rated on how often they show specific behaviors that are important to their job—not just vague traits. These behaviors are based on real examples from the workplace.
Although BARS is supposed to give very accurate and fair results, it’s hard to create and takes a lot of time. The method starts by collecting specific examples of good and bad performance, sorting them into job categories, and giving each example a score that reflects performance quality. Examples include behaviors like “plans well,” “handles emergencies,” or “follows instructions.” Only the most clearly rated examples are used in the final form.
Relative Standards Methods
Instead of rating employees based on fixed standards, these methods compare employees to each other. The most common ways of doing this are:
Group Order Ranking
Here, employees are sorted into groups like “top 20%” or “bottom 20%.” This is like how students are ranked for scholarships or college recommendations. For example, if you have 20 employees, only 4 can be in the top 20%. This method prevents everyone from being rated “average” or “excellent,” which often happens with other methods.
The downside? If you have a small group of employees, you may be forced to rank someone lower even if they’re performing well. Also, someone could look like a great performer just because others are doing poorly—and vice versa.
Individual Ranking
This method simply lists employees from best to worst. If you’re ranking 30 people, it assumes the difference between #1 and #2 is the same as between #21 and #22, which isn’t always true. Like group ranking, this method works better with smaller teams and has similar pros and cons.
Paired Comparison
Here, each employee is compared one-on-one with every other employee based on a specific job trait. The person who is judged better more often gets a higher score. While it’s a thorough method, it gets complicated and time-consuming with large groups.
Using Achieved Outcomes to Evaluate Employees Management by Objectives (MBO)
This method, also called Management by Objectives (MBO), evaluates employees based on how well they meet specific goals tied to their job. These goals are set at every level of the company—from top management to individual employees. Managers and employees work together to create these goals, which means it’s a team effort, not just top-down orders.
If everyone meets their goals, then the team or department will too—and eventually, so will the company. It’s a structured and clear way to show how each person contributes to the bigger picture.
Common Elements in MBO Programs
There are four key parts of any MBO program:
Specific Goals:
Goals should be clear and measurable. Instead of saying “cut costs,” say “reduce expenses by 8%.”
Participative Decision Making:
Employees help set their own goals instead of being assigned goals without input.
Specific Time Period:
Every goal has a deadline—like three months, six months, or a year.
Performance Feedback:
Regular feedback helps employees track progress and make improvements. Feedback can be ongoing and also happen during formal reviews.
Factors That Can Distort Appraisals
Ideally, performance evaluations should be fair and based on actual job performance. But in reality, personal opinions, habits, and errors often creep in. This is especially true when it’s hard to set clear standards for complex jobs like teachers, researchers, or consultants. Here are a few common errors:
Leniency Error
Some evaluators are naturally generous (positive leniency) and give high scores, while others are too strict (negative leniency). This can result in unfair ratings—especially when different people are doing the evaluations.
For example, if two employees do the same job equally well but have different supervisors—one strict, one lenient—their scores could be very different.
Halo Error
This happens when an evaluator lets one good (or bad) quality influence the entire review. For example, if an employee is very punctual, the evaluator might rate them highly in all areas—even if their performance isn’t as strong in others.
To prevent this, forms can include questions that are worded in opposite ways to force the evaluator to think more carefully about each item.
Similarity Error
This happens when the evaluator favors people who remind them of themselves. For instance, a very outgoing manager might give higher scores to outgoing employees, even if their actual performance doesn’t deserve it.
Low Appraiser Motivation
Sometimes, evaluators just don’t care much about the appraisal process. Maybe they don’t see the value, or they’re too busy. When this happens, the evaluations may be rushed, careless, or inaccurate—which hurts both the employee and the company.
FAQ
1. Identify the three purposes of performance management systems and whom they serve.
Performance management systems are created to do three main things: give feedback, help employees grow, and keep proper records. These systems benefit employees by helping them improve, support managers by guiding evaluations, and assist organizations in tracking progress and making decisions.
2. Explain the six steps in the appraisal process.
Here’s how the performance appraisal process works step-by-step:
1. First, the manager and employee agree on what good performance looks like.
2. Together, they set clear goals that can be measured.
3. The manager then checks how the employee is actually doing.
4. They compare this performance with the agreed standards.
5. The manager and employee then talk about the results.
6. If needed, the manager helps the employee improve through coaching or other support.
3. Discuss absolute standards in performance management systems.
Absolute standards mean judging employees based on a fixed set of rules or expectations set by the company. Everyone is measured against these same standards, not compared to each other. Common methods include writing performance essays, noting specific important actions, using checklists, rating skills on a scale, or using detailed behavior-based tools like BARS (Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales).
4. Describe relative standards in performance management systems.
Relative standards compare employees to each other instead of a fixed benchmark. This way, managers can see who’s performing better or worse in the group. Methods include ranking employees in order of performance, rating them one-by-one against others, or doing paired comparisons.
5. Discuss how MBO can be an appraisal method.
MBO, or Management by Objectives, works as an appraisal tool by setting clear goals for each employee. At review time, their performance is judged based on how well they achieved those goals. This method encourages employees to focus on results.
6. Explain why performance appraisals might be distorted.
Sometimes, performance reviews aren’t completely fair. This can happen for several reasons:
1. Managers being too nice (leniency)
2. Judging everything based on one good trait (halo effect)
3. Favoring people like themselves (similarity bias)
4. Giving average scores to avoid standing out (central tendency)
5. Not caring enough to rate properly (low motivation)
6. Pressure to give higher scores
7. Using the wrong things to judge performance
7. Identify ways to make performance management systems more effective.
To make appraisals better, companies can:
1. Focus on specific behaviors, not just general impressions
2. Use both absolute and relative methods
3. Give regular feedback, not just once a year
4. Get input from several people, not just one manager
5. Choose raters carefully
6. Train managers on how to give fair reviews
7. Include peer reviews
8. Reward managers who rate honestly and accurately
8. Describe the term 360-degree appraisal.
A 360-degree appraisal gathers feedback from many sources—your boss, coworkers, team members, customers, even yourself. This full-circle view helps get a better, more balanced picture of how someone is performing.
9. Explain the criteria for a successful performance appraisal meeting.
A good appraisal meeting should include:
1. A manager who’s well-prepared
2. A positive, respectful atmosphere
3. A clear purpose for the discussion
4. The employee being actively involved
5. Feedback focused on work actions, not personality
6. Real examples of what went well or didn’t
7. A mix of praise and constructive advice
8. Making sure the employee understands everything
9. A plan to help the employee improve and grow
10. Discuss how performance appraisals may differ in a global environment.
When performance appraisals are done in other countries, they may look different. Different cultures may affect who gives the feedback, how the review is structured, and how honest or direct people are. That means companies may need to adjust their usual U.S.-style appraisal systems when working internationally.
Related Articles
What is Human Resource Management, Objectives and Functions of HRM.
Structure of HR Department and Employee relation function
Steps involved in the Selection Process
8. Unlock HRM, Socialization, Assumptions, and Socialization Process
8.1 Unlock HRM, Employee Training, Training vs. Development, & Best Evaluation Methods in HR
9. HRM Unlocked Managing Careers effectively, Stages Involved in Careers
10. HRM Performance Management System PMS, Boosting Productivity, Profit, and Employee Excellence
